The curve fitting problem: A bayesian rejoinder

Philosophy of Science 66 (3):402 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the curve fitting problem two conflicting desiderata, simplicity and goodness-of-fit pull in opposite directions. To solve this problem, two proposals, the first one based on Bayes's theorem criterion (BTC) and the second one advocated by Forster and Sober based on Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) are discussed. We show that AIC, which is frequentist in spirit, is logically equivalent to BTC, provided that a suitable choice of priors is made. We evaluate the charges against Bayesianism and contend that AIC approach has shortcomings. We also discuss the relationship between Schwarz's Bayesian Information Criterion and BTC

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bayes Not Bust! Why Simplicity Is No Problem for Bayesians.David L. Dowe, Steve Gardner & and Graham Oppy - 2007 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):709 - 754.
Scientific Rationality.Michael Bert Kruse - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Forster and Sober on the curve-fitting problem.André Kukla - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (2):248-252.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
292 (#72,957)

6 months
17 (#161,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Truth-Seeking by Abduction.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2018 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
On the Philosophy of Unsupervised Learning.David S. Watson - 2023 - Philosophy and Technology 36 (2):1-26.
Two dogmas of strong objective bayesianism.Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Gordon Brittan - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):45 – 65.
The curve-fitting problem: An objectivist view.Stanley A. Mulaik - 2001 - Philosophy of Science 68 (2):218-241.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations