A puzzle about accommodation and truth

Philosophical Studies 179 (3):759-776 (2022)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present and discuss a puzzle involving accommodation. The puzzle is based on three assumptions. The first assumption is that accommodation takes place after an utterance. The second assumption is that accommodation can make a difference to the truth-value of an utterance even if the utterance is not about the future. The third assumption is that something that takes place after an utterance cannot make a difference to the truth-value of the utterance unless the utterance is about the future. Since these assumptions are jointly inconsistent, one of them must be false. The question is which one we ought to reject. The majority of the discussion is devoted to discussing each of the options, and the tentative conclusion is that the most plausible strategy is to reject the third thesis. That amounts to saying that something that takes place after an utterance can make a difference to the truth-value of the utterance even if the utterance is not about the future.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-09

Downloads
11 (#859,682)

6 months
11 (#68,478)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Derek Ball
University of St. Andrews
Torfinn Huvenes
University of Bergen

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
The Meaning of 'Meaning'.Hillary Putnam - 1975 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:131-193.
Knowledge and Practical Interests.Jason Stanley - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Scorekeeping in a Language Game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Similar books and articles

Some Thoughts About the Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever.Tim S. Roberts - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (6):609-612.
A Non-Puzzle About Assertion and Truth.John Turri - 2020 - Logos and Episteme 11 (4):475-479.
A Puzzle About Logical Analysis.Stefan Rinner - 2021 - Philosophia 50 (2):691-698.
The Lawn Mowing Puzzle.Jeremy Gwiazda - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (3):629-629.
Epistemic Intuitions and Epistemic Contextualism.Finn Spicer - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):366 - 385.
The Puzzle of the Laws of Appearance.Adam Pautz - 2020 - Philosophical Issues 30 (1):257-272.
De Se Puzzles and Frege Puzzles.Stephan Torre & Clas Weber - 2022 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65 (1):50-76.
Donnellan on a Puzzle About Belief.Graeme Forbes - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):169 - 180.
Conditionals, Indeterminacy, and Triviality.Justin Khoo - 2013 - Philosophical Perspectives 27 (1):260-287.
Is Truth Valuable?Ryan Christensen - 2013 - Philosophy 88 (3):451-466.