Explaining Vampirism: Two Divergent Attractors of Dead Human Concepts

Journal of Cognition and Culture 15 (3-4):285-298 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores the cognitive foundations of vampirism beliefs. The occurrence of beliefs of the dead rising from graves and returning to harm the living across many cultures indicates that this concept has features that make it successful in the process of cultural transmission. Comparing ghost- and vampire-like beliefs, it is argued that bodiless agents and animated but dead bodies represent two divergent cognitive attractors concerning concepts of dead humans. The inferential potential of the classic idea of a bodiless ghost is based on intuitions produced by the mental system of Theory of Mind, while the traditional concepts of a vampire attribute to the dead only minimal intentionality. The inferential potential of a vampire is based on the system of disease avoidance and the emotion of disgust related to the dead body. Vampirism beliefs represent a cognitively attractive combination of a hazard and relevant actions to eliminate it: they postulate a threat of an animated corpse and relevant behavioral reaction, namely fatal interventions on vampire’s body.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dead-Survivors, the Living Dead, and Concepts of Death.K. Mitch Hodge - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (3):539-565.
The frightening borderlands of Enlightenment: The vampire problem.Peter J. Bräunlein - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (3):710-719.
Attractors and pathological aspects in excitable cells.B. Delord - 1999 - Acta Biotheoretica 47 (3-4):239-252.
What are cultural attractors?Andrew Buskell - 2017 - Biology and Philosophy 32 (3):377-394.
Knowing “Necro-Waste”.Philip R. Olson - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (3):326-345.
Buddhist Philosophy of the Dead.Fumihiko Sueki - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 6:259-265.
Are Brain Dead Individuals Dead? Grounds for Reasonable Doubt.E. Christian Brugger - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (3):329-350.
Explaining Culture.Adam Morton - 1997 - Philosophical Books 38 (4):235-239.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-01

Downloads
14 (#983,512)

6 months
3 (#967,057)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Basic emotions.Paul Ekman - 1999 - In Tim Dalgleish & M. J. Powers (eds.), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Wiley. pp. 4--5.
The folk psychology of souls.Jesse M. Bering - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):453-+.

View all 11 references / Add more references