Formulas for which contraction is admissible

Logic Journal of the IGPL 6 (1):43-48 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A formula A is said to have the contraction property in a logic L if whenever A, A, Γ ⊨ L B also A, Γ & ; L B. In MLL and in MALL without the additive constants a formula has the contraction property if it is a theorem. Adding the mix rule does not change this fact. In MALL and in affine logic A has the contraction property if either A is provable of A is equivalent to the additive constant 0. We present some general proof-theoretical principles from which all these results easily follow

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to be R eally Contraction-Free.Greg Restall - 1993 - Studia Logica 52 (3):381 - 391.
Exchange rules.Mario Piazza - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):509-516.
A survey of multiple contractions.André Fuhrmann & Sven Ove Hansson - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (1):39-75.
Kernel contraction.Sven Ove Hansson - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):845-859.
Connectification forn-contraction.Andreja Prijatelj - 1995 - Studia Logica 54 (2):149 - 171.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-13

Downloads
18 (#828,105)

6 months
3 (#961,692)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arnon Avron
Tel Aviv University

Citations of this work

Contraction and revision.Shawn Standefer - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Logic 13 (3):58-77.
Variations on a Theme of Curry.Lloyd Humberstone - 2006 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):101-131.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references