Abstract

In Transformation for October 1991, Samuel Escobar examined missiology in the Lausanne Movement. He suggested three models persisted - “post-imperial” missiology, managerial missiology and a critical missiology from the periphery. He suggested that the church-growth school failed to appreciate those aspects of missionary work that cannot be measured or reduced to figures. In this issue, Ramez Atullah from Egypt and Ralph Winter respond to Samuel Escobar, who also responds to his respondents.