Eight Inference Rules for Implication

Studia Logica 107 (4):781-808 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Utilizing an idea that has its first appearance in Gerhard Gentzen’s unpublished manuscripts, we generate an exhaustive repertoire of all the possible inference rules that are related to the left implication inference rule of the sequent calculus from a ground sequent, that is, a logical axiom. We discuss the similarities and differences of these derived rules as well as their interaction with the implication right rule under cut and the structural axiom. We further consider the question of analyticity of cuts in calculi using one of the new rules instead of the standard left implication rule.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-08-22

Downloads
40 (#113,921)

6 months
6 (#1,472,471)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Explosion Calculus.Michael Arndt - 2020 - Studia Logica 108 (3):509-547.
Comments on the Contributions.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 2024 - In Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.), Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Springer. pp. 443-455.
Eight Rules for Implication Elimination.Michael Arndt - 2024 - In Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.), Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Springer. pp. 239-273.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Gentzen's proof systems: byproducts in a work of genius.Jan von Plato - 2012 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (3):313-367.
Analytic cut.Raymond M. Smullyan - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (4):560-564.

Add more references