Tests of the discontinuity hypothesis of the effects of independent outcome values upon bets

Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (3p1):444 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0025527

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Effects of independent and dependent outcome values upon bets.Francis W. Irwin & Joan G. Snodgrass - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):282.
Gaming Prediction Markets: Equilibrium Strategies with a Market Maker.Yiling Chen, Rahul Sami & Daniel M. Reeves - unknown
Two Independent Value Orientations: Ideal and Counter-Ideal Leader Values and Their Impact on Followers' Respect for and Identification with Their Leaders. [REVIEW]Matthias M. Graf, Niels Van Quaquebeke & Rolf Van Dick - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):185-195.
Reflecting on the action or its outcome: Behavior representation level modulates high level outcome priming effects on self-agency experiences.Anouk van der Weiden, Henk Aarts & Kirsten I. Ruys - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (1):21-32.
A Betting Market: Description and a Theoretical Explanation of Bets in Pelota Matches. [REVIEW]Loreto Llorente & Josemari Aizpurua - 2008 - Theory and Decision 64 (2-3):421-446.
Reference values for mental health assessment instruments: objectives and methods of the Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study.Yvonne W. M. Schulte-van Maaren, Ingrid V. E. Carlier, Erik J. Giltay, Martijn S. van Noorden, Margot W. M. de Waal, Nic J. A. van der Wee & Frans G. Zitman - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (2):342-350.
Bases for preferences among three-outcome bets.Sarah Lichtenstein - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (2):162.
De Finetti was Right: Probability Does Not Exist.Robert F. Nau - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):89-124.
Remarks on "Random Sequences".Branden Fitelson & Daniel Osherson - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Logic 12 (1).
Causation and the making/allowing distinction.Sarah McGrath - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 114 (1-2):81 - 106.
The Main Argument for Value Incommensurability (and Why It Fails).Stephen Ellis - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):27-43.
Reasoning about outcome probabilities and values in preference reversals.Marcus Selart, Ole Boe & Tommy Garling - 1999 - Thinking and Reasoning 5 (2):175 – 188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
9 (#1,254,017)

6 months
4 (#790,394)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The elusive wishful thinking effect.Maya Bar-Hillel & David Budescu - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (1):71 – 103.
The psychology of chance.Ellen J. Langer - 1977 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 7 (2):185–203.
Wishful thinking in the prediction of competitive outcomes.Paul C. Price - 2000 - Thinking and Reasoning 6 (2):161 – 172.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references