A Unique Propensity to Engage in Homosexual Acts

In Race, Gender, and Sexuality: Philosophical Issues of Identity and Justice (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


After stating "I am gay" Navy Lieutenant Paul G. Thomasson was honorably discharged from the military. In Thomasson v. Perry (1996), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth District affirmed Thomasson's discharge. Thomasson is now considered the leading case evaluating the U.S. military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy. In this paper, I show that the court's analysis of the Department of Defense policy rests of two unarticulated and undefended assumptions about sexuality. The first is that an act of sex is essentially defined in terms of the sexual orientation of the persons engaging in that act. The second is that whether or not a person is an open homosexual determines the essential nature of the homosexual acts of others. I conclude that both assumptions are untenable, therefore the "don't ask, don't tell" policy is indefensible.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics and national defense: the timeless issues.James C. Gaston & Janis Bren Hietala (eds.) - 1993 - Washington, D.C.: For sale by U.S. G.P.O..
Medicine as social science: The case of Freud on homosexuality.Michael Ruse - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (4):361-386.
The Army's professional military ethic in an era of persistent conflict.Don M. Snider - 2009 - Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College. Edited by Paul Oh & Kevin Toner.


Added to PP

888 (#17,050)

6 months
121 (#35,224)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jami L. Anderson
University of Michigan - Flint

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references