Forgiving as emotional distancing

Social Philosophy and Policy 36 (1):6-26 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


:In this essay, I present an account of forgiveness as a process of emotional distancing. The central claim is that, understood in these terms, forgiveness does not require a change in judgment. Rationally forgiving someone, in other words, does not require that one judges the significance of the wrongdoing differently or that one comes to the conclusion that the attitudes behind it have changed in a favorable way. The model shows in what sense forgiving is inherently social, shows why we should be pluralists about it, and provides a basis for arguing against the existence of necessary conditions of forgiving.

Similar books and articles

The Possibility of Preemptive Forgiving.Nicolas Cornell - 2017 - Philosophical Review 126 (2):241-272.
Can We Un-forgive?Monique Wonderly - 2021 - Philosophers' Imprint 21 (6).
What is involved in forgiving?Paul M. Hughes - 1997 - Philosophia 25 (1-4):33-49.
Forgiveness or Fairness?Krista K. Thomason - 2015 - Philosophical Papers 44 (2):233-260.
Hannah Arendt and collective forgiving.Glen Pettigrove - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (4):483–500.
What is involved in forgiving?Paul M. Hughes - 1993 - Journal of Value Inquiry 27 (3-4):331-340.
Against Elective Forgiveness.Per-Erik Milam - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (3):569-584.


Added to PP

231 (#91,212)

6 months
1,047 (#954)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Santiago Amaya
University of the Andes

Citations of this work

Defending Elective Forgiveness.Craig K. Agule - 2023 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 10.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Emotions, Value, and Agency.Christine Tappolet - 2016 - Oxford: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 41 references / Add more references