Ticking Time-Bombs and Torture1

In Andrew I. Cohen & Christopher Heath Wellman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 22--247 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The general consensus among philosophers is that the use of torture is never justified. In Terrorism, Ticking Time-Bombs, and Torture, Fritz Allhoff demonstrates the weakness of the case against torture; while allowing that torture constitutes a moral wrong, he nevertheless argues that, in exceptional cases, it represents the lesser of two evils. Allhoff does not take this position lightly. He begins by examining the way terrorism challenges traditional norms, discussing the morality of various practices of torture, and critically exploring the infamous ticking time-bomb scenario. After carefully considering these issues from a purely philosophical perspective, he turns to the empirical ramifications of his arguments, addressing criticisms of torture and analyzing the impact its adoption could have on democracy, institutional structures, and foreign policy. The crucial questions of how to justly authorize torture and how to set limits on its use make up the final section of this timely, provocative, and carefully argued book.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why torture is wrong.Bob Brecher - 2012 - In Brecher Bob (ed.), Contemporary Debates on Terrorism. Routledge. pp. 159-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-26

Downloads
48 (#322,753)

6 months
1 (#1,722,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fritz Allhoff, J.D., Ph.D.
Western Michigan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references