Abstract

This article presents reasons to believe that the following two statements are true of at least some of the laws that established criminal quaestiones in the Late Roman Republic: 1. Once a verdict was given, the defendant could not (with certain exceptions) be put on trial again under that law for acts that he had committed before the trial. 2. The prosecutor was not limited by any list of charges submitted at the beginning of the trial, as to the charges he was allowed to bring before the jurors in his oration(s) and presentation of testimony.