Authors
N. P. Adams
University of Virginia
Abstract
Institutions undertake a huge variety of constitutive purposes. One of the roles of legitimacy is to protect and promote an institution’s pursuit of its purpose; state legitimacy is generally understood as the right to rule, for example. When considering legitimacy beyond the state, we have to take account of how differences in purposes change legitimacy. I focus in particular on how differences in purpose matter for the stringency of the standards that an institution must meet in order to be legitimate. An important characteristic of an institution’s purpose is its deontic status, i.e. whether it is morally impermissible, merely permissible, or mandatory. Although this matters, it does so in some non-obvious ways; the mere fact of a morally impermissible purpose is not necessarily delegitimating, for example. I also consider the problem of conflicting, multiple, and contested institutional purposes, and the different theoretical roles for institutional purpose. Understanding how differences in purpose matter for an institution’s legitimacy is one part of the broader project of theorizing institutional legitimacy in the many contexts beyond the traditional context of the state.
Keywords political legitimacy  institutions  institutional purpose
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/13698230.2019.1565712
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):1-7.
The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions.Allen Buchanan & Robert O. Keohane - 2006 - Ethics and International Affairs 20 (4):405-437.
A Right to Do Wrong.Jeremy Waldron - 1981 - Ethics 92 (1):21-39.
Institutional Legitimacy.N. P. Adams - 2018 - Journal of Political Philosophy:84-102.
Solidarity in the European Union.Andrea Sangiovanni - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (2):213-241.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Legitimacy as the Right to Function.Sören Hilbrich - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Institutional Legitimacy.N. P. Adams - 2018 - Journal of Political Philosophy:84-102.
The UN Security Council, Normative Legitimacy and the Challenge of Specificity.Antoinette Scherz & Alain Zysset - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:371-391.
Legitimacy Beyond the State: Institutional Purposes and Contextual Constraints.N. P. Adams, Antoinette Scherz & Cord Schmelzle - 2020 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23 (3):281-291.
Institutional Legitimacy and Geoengineering Governance.Daniel Edward Callies - 2018 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (3):324-340.
Three Elements of Stakeholder Legitimacy.Adele Santana - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (2):257-265.
On the Value of Political Legitimacy.Mathew Coakley - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (4):345-369.
Looking for New Forms of Legitimacy in Asia.Andreas Scherer - 2014 - Business and Society 53 (2):187-225.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-13

Total views
317 ( #33,767 of 2,520,788 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #24,147 of 2,520,788 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes