Conflict and decision

Philosophy of Science 34 (2):188-193 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Howard Kahane's current reply to my previous discussion of Goodman's elimination rules, he suggests both that the notion of conflict required by the first elimination rule cannot be made clear, and that both proposed revisions of the second elimination rule are too strong [4]. These seem to me to be the points which require settlement, and I would like to discuss them in this paper.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,296

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Ackermann.Howard Kahane - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (2):184-187.
Reduction, elimination, and firewalking.Colin Cheyne - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (2):349-357.
Tautology Elimination, Cut Elimination, and S5.Andrezj Indrzejczak - 2017 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 26 (4):461-471.
Eight Rules for Implication Elimination.Michael Arndt - 2024 - In Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.), Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Springer. pp. 239-273.
Bilateralism in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Nissim Francez - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic (2-3):1-21.
A cut-elimination proof in intuitionistic predicate logic.Mirjana Borisavljević - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 99 (1-3):105-136.
Bilateralism in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Nissim Francez - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):239-259.
Bilateral Inversion Principles.Nils Kürbis - 2022 - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 358:202–215.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2 (#1,819,493)

6 months
53 (#90,063)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Discussion: Nelson Goodman's entrenchment theory.Howard Kahane - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):377.
Projecting unprojectibles.Robert J. Ackermann - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):70-75.
Reply to Ackermann.Howard Kahane - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (2):184-187.

Add more references