The answers shown here are not necessarily the same provided as part of the 2009 PhilPapers Survey. These answers can be updated at any time.
Question | Answer | Comments | |
A priori knowledge: yes or no? | Accept: yes | | |
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will? | Accept: compatibilism | | |
God: theism or atheism? | Accept: theism | | |
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism? | Accept: rationalism | | |
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism? | Accept: relativism | | |
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean? | Other | The first intelligence appeared in the physical zero state as the will of existence. The development of that will evolved to the Laws of Nature. | |
Logic: classical or non-classical? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Mental content: internalism or externalism? | Accept: internalism | | |
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism? | Accept: moral realism | | |
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism? | Accept: naturalism | | |
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism? | Accept: physicalism | | |
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism? | Accept: cognitivism | | |
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism? | Accept: internalism | It is important that we take in account ourselfs. First I have to be clear who I am and be happy. If I am able to reach that I will be able to make happy those whom around me. | |
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics? | Accept more than one | deontology and virtue ethics if I understand them right. | |
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism? | Accept more than one | Libertarianism and communitarianism. We should have equal rights but we are not equal. | |
Proper names: Fregean or Millian? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism? | Accept: scientific realism | | |
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death? | Other | my energy with consciousness is a consequence of a 13.7 billion years long cause and causality development guided by the Laws of Nature. I am sure that there is a reason for my existence and even my physical and intellectual appearance separates I will exist. | |
Time: A-theory or B-theory? | Other | Not familiar with those theories. Time is a linear information about space and energy/matter. | |
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible? | Lean toward: inconceivable | | |