My philosophical views

The answers shown here are not necessarily the same provided as part of the 2009 PhilPapers Survey. These answers can be updated at any time.

See also:

QuestionAnswerComments
A priori knowledge: yes or no?Accept: noI know only the present moment.
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism?Reject bothAbstract object as defined in Object Oriented Programming.
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective?Reject bothAesthetic value is meaningless to me.
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no?Reject bothThere is no such distinction; it is Kantian.
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism?Reject bothMy view these words cannot describe. How do you explain the Einstein's four dimensional world.
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism?Reject allThe world is me. No "isms"
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will?Reject allI accept causality as stated by Lord Buddha: Four Ariyan Truths.
God: theism or atheism?OtherNo creator God, others I cannot give an answer meaningful to a another.
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism?OtherAgain no isms
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism?Reject allNone of the above. I know what I see provided there is a way to name it;
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean?Reject bothI am talking abaout a compeletely different conception of reality.
Logic: classical or non-classical?Accept: classical
Mental content: internalism or externalism?Reject bothFor me, there is no separate mind and matter. I am aware of a MindBody. That is a thing that is living. For example.
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism?Reject bothReject isms
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism?Reject bothNo metas either
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism?Reject bothMindBody. See previous answer.
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism?Reject bothNi isma. The past is dead and the future unborn
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism?Accept bothWhat is moral is any action that is good for me and others. [both criteria must be satisfied]
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes?Reject bothThere is no box in reality. Is an electron a particle or a wave?
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics?Reject allIn a 'world' where truth is one, what true is what is right.
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory?Reject allSee my previous answers, No 'isms'. There is nothing permanent in this world.
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view?Reject allA person is MindBody or NameForm.
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism?Reject allI strictly keep aways from politics. For me religion is also politics
Proper names: Fregean or Millian?Lean toward: FregeanMillian appears to be a typing mistake. Somebody might use Fregean with regard to Frege.
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism?Reject bothI accept personl observation. Considered to be true only if it is repeatable.
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death?Accept: survival
Time: A-theory or B-theory?Reject bothTime is not relevant.
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch?The question is too unclear to answerThis related, I think right hand/ left hand drive. I would go to closest legal turn.
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic?OtherIf A makes A statement about the real world to B then if B agrees with it is, assuming both A and B are honest, then the statement is true.
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible?The question is too unclear to answerWhat is the definition of a zombie?