Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. ‘Materially social’ critical realism: an interview with Dave Elder-Vass.Dave Elder-Vass & Jamie Morgan - 2022 - Journal of Critical Realism 21 (2):211-246.
    In this wide-ranging interview, Dave Elder-Vass discusses his main contributions to critical realist theory over two decades. In the first half, he explains his early work on emergence, agency, str...
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Symmetry, Forced Asymmetry, Direct Apprehension, and Elective Modernism.Harry Collins - 2014 - Journal of Critical Realism 13 (4):411-421.
    Crazily, Christopher Norris seems to think sociology is at war with philosophy; it is not. I respond to his hostile comments on the sociology of scientific knowledge, which was inspired by Wittgenstein, by explaining the need for symmetry in the explanation of scientific knowledge, methodological relativism, elective modernism and a number of other issues.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Scientific realism and quantum theory: on the status of the ‘unobservables’.Arunima Chakraborty - 2023 - Journal of Critical Realism 22 (3):445-466.
    Scientific realism does not view theoretical terms as mere instruments of experimental predictions; it grants referential status to natural kind terms with 'epistemic access' and view scientific theories and terms as corresponding to physical phenomena and entities which exist independently of observation, and as thereby being the source of objective -approximate and not absolute- knowledge of the physical realm. As a result, scientific realism is accused of ontologising the unobservables. Against this charge, scientific realism posits the idea of the dialectical (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reply to Christopher Norris.David Bloor - 2014 - Journal of Critical Realism 13 (4):399-410.
    In this paper David Bloor defends his sociological analysis of the disputes over the nature of aerodynamic lift described in his historical study The Enigma of the Aerofoil. The criticisms expressed by Christopher Norris are rejected on the grounds that Norris systematically misrepresents the strong programme in the sociology of knowledge, e.g. by treating the principle of explanatory symmetry as if it meant ‘parity of esteem‘. Some of the various senses of the word ‘realism’ are identified and an account is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations