Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Discrepancies in the outcomes resulting from different voting schemes.Hannu Nurmi - 1988 - Theory and Decision 25 (2):193-208.
    It is well-known that different social choice procedures often result in different choice sets. The article focuses on how often this is likely to happen in impartial cultures. The focus is on Borda count, plurality method, max-min method and Copeland's procedure. The probabilities of Condorcet violations of the Borda count and plurality method are also reported. Although blatantly false as a descriptive hypothesis, the impartial culture assumption can be given an interpretation which makes the results obtained in impartial cultures particularly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A Comparison of Some Distance-Based Choice Rules in Ranking Environments.Hannu Nurmi - 2004 - Theory and Decision 57 (1):5-24.
    We discuss the relationships between positional rules (such as plurality and approval voting as well as the Borda count), Dodgson’s, Kemeny’s and Litvak’s methods of reaching consensus. The discrepancies between methods are seen as results of different intuitive conceptions of consensus goal states and ways of measuring distances therefrom. Saari’s geometric methodology is resorted to in the analysis of the consensus reaching methods.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Control complexity in Borda elections: Solving all open cases of offline control and some cases of online control.Marc Neveling & Jörg Rothe - 2021 - Artificial Intelligence 298 (C):103508.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Dimensions of election procedures: Analyses and comparisons.Peter C. Fishburn - 1983 - Theory and Decision 15 (4):371-397.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation