The Ethics of Painism: The Argument Against Painful Experiments

Between the Species 13 (2):3 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ryder’s Painism and His Criticism of Utilitarianism.Joost Leuven & Tatjana Višak - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (2):409-419.
RYDER, RD-Painism: A Modern Morality.J. M. Spooner - 2002 - Philosophical Books 43 (3):238-239.
Vivisection, morals and medicine.R. G. Frey - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):94-97.
Speciesism, Painism, and Morality.Steve F. Sapontzis - 2014 - Journal of Animal Ethics 4 (1):95-102,.
Ethical issues associated with sheep fly strike research, prevention, and control.Michael C. Morris - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):205-217.
Animal experimentation.Roman Kolar - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):111-122.
Personality characteristics of volunteers for painful experiments.Nicholas F. Skinner - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 20 (6):299-300.
Thought and thought experiments.David Cole - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 45 (May):431-44.
On thought experiments: Is there more to the argument?John D. Norton - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1139-1151.
How to Reconstruct a Thought Experiment.Marek Picha - 2011 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 18 (2):154-188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-14

Downloads
11 (#1,162,085)

6 months
1 (#1,508,411)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references