Negotiating the Classroom

Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):78-78 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Negotiating Between Learner and Mathematics: A Conceptual Framework to Analyze Teacher Sensitivity Toward Constructivism in a Mathematics Classroom” by Philip Borg, Dave Hewitt & Ian Jones. Upshot: Borg et al. argue that there is a Mathematics-Negotiation-Learner structure that can be used as a conceptual framework in order to evaluate the application of radical constructivism in teaching. This structure assumes a coherent consensual domain that is the mathematics being negotiated. However, there are at least four different consensual domains that make up mathematics. The mathematics that is the consensual domain in an RC classroom has distinct features that are designed to support the student’s construction of mathematics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward a Model of Constructivist Mathematics Teaching.L. P. Steffe - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):75-77.
Mathematical Observers Observing Mathematics.J. Proulx - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):80-82.
When Is a Constructivist not a Constructivist?T. McCloughlin - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):79-80.
What Do We Lose If We Abandon Constructivism?B. Jaworski - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (1):73-75.
Revisiting the Efficacy of Constructivism in Mathematics Education.Mdutshekelwa Ndlovu - 2013 - Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal 27 (April):1-13.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-15

Downloads
5 (#1,544,856)

6 months
2 (#1,206,802)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references