Zur Philosophie der Demokratie: Arrow-Theorem, Liberalität und strukturelle Normen

Analyse & Kritik 13 (2):184-203 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paradoxes and dilemmas of social choice theory can be taken as an argument against a certain view of democracy: For the identity theory democracy represents a collective actor standing for aggregated individual interests. According to a second model of society, democracy has its normative basis in structural traits of interaction and cooperation. Within the formal theory of politics both the Arrow-Theorem and the Liberal Paradox undermine the identity theory and give us reasons for the second, the normative theory which takes democracy as being constituted by structural rules.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Demokratie und Wahrheit, ISBN 978-3-406-54985-4.J. Nida-Rumelin & A. Bohmeyer - 2008 - Theologie Und Philosophie 83 (2):268.
Jenseits der Demokratie.Jean-françois Kervegan - 2008 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 56 (2):223-243.
Der Vorrang der Demokratie vor der Philosophie.Richard Rorty & Alan Posener - 1988 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 42 (1):3 - 17.
Liberale Demokratie und „sittlicher“ Staat.Karl-Heinz Ilting† - 1986 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68 (1):2-21.
Zu Jürgen Habermas' Option für Fortschritt, Vernunft und Demokratie.Hagen Bogner - 1991 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 39 (1-6):245-254.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-04

Downloads
43 (#373,177)

6 months
6 (#531,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julian Nida-Rümelin
Humboldt-University, Berlin