Providing monetary and non-monetary goods to research participants: perspectives and practices of researchers and Research Ethics Committees in Zambia

, &
Tandf: Global Bioethics:1-14 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/11287462.2018.1527672

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Paying research participants: a study of current practices in Australia.C. L. Fry - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):542-547.
Reforming the ethical review system: balancing the rights and interests of research participants with the duty to facilitate good research.E. Cave & C. Nichols - 2007 - Clinical Ethics 2 (2):74-79.
The value of sharing genomic findings with research ethics committees.Angeliki Kerasidou - 2017 - Research Ethics 13 (2):59-64.
Protecting vulnerable research participants: A Foucault-inspired analysis of ethics committees.T. I. Juritzen, H. Grimen & K. Heggen - 2011 - Nursing Ethics 18 (5):640-650.
Ethical practices and beliefs of psychopathology researchers.Sandra T. Sigmon - 1995 - Ethics and Behavior 5 (4):295 – 309.
The value of respect in human research ethics: a coneptual analysis and a practical guide.Ian Pieper & Colin J. H. Thomason - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):232-253.
Payment of research participants: current practice and policies of Irish research ethics committees.Eric Roche, Romaine King, Helen M. Mohan, Blanaid Gavin & Fiona McNicholas - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):591-593.
What does 'respect for persons' require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research.F. A. Miller, R. Z. Hayeems, L. Li & J. P. Bytautas - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (1):48-52.
Ethical Review of Action Research: The Challenges for Researchers and Research Ethics Committees.Leslie Gelling & Carol Munn-Giddings - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (3):100-106.
Science review in research ethics committees: Double jeopardy?Stephen Humphreys, Hilary Thomas & Robyn Martin - 2014 - Research Ethics 10 (4):227-237.
New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest.E. Cave - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):318-321.
In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees.Elizabeth Fistein & Sally Quilligan - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (4):224-227.
Could providing financial incentives to research participants be ultimately self-defeating?T. L. Zutlevics - 2016 - Research Ethics 12 (3):137-148.
How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.Carl H. Coleman & Marie-Charlotte Bouësseau - 2008 - BMC Medical Ethics 9 (1):6-.
User involvement leads to more ethically sound research.Kristina Staley & Virginia Minogue - 2006 - Clinical Ethics 1 (2):95-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-05

Downloads
20 (#770,916)

6 months
8 (#368,968)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Inducement in Research.Martin Wilkinson & Andrew Moore - 1997 - Bioethics 11 (5):373-389.
Undue Inducement: Nonsense on Stilts?Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):9-13.
Ending Concerns About Undue Inducement.Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (1):100-105.
Ending Concerns about Undue Inducement.Ezekiel J. Emanuel - 2004 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (1):100-105.

View all 11 references / Add more references