- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Front Matter
In Meaning and Mystery. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 1–10 (2010)
Abstract
The prelims comprise: Half‐Title Page Title Page Copyright Page Dedication Page Table of Contents Preface Acknowledgments.
Believing in God ‐ does anyone actually believe frustrating to talk about ‐ where thinking about important issues differs from one's own good reasons to believe in God asking for reasons ‐ encountering beliefs that seem puzzling or doubtful narrative framing ‐ understanding judgments that people make alternative narratives ‐ reflecting on life‐orienting narratives that persuade us revelation and reason making sense of things ‐ dimension of reality beyond ordinary empirical observation treating God as an empirical hypothesis disbelief in God and rejection of life stories as a guide to life
My notes
Similar books and articles
Suggestions for Further Reading.David M. Holley - 2010 - In Meaning and Mystery. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 214–221.
Giving Reasons Does Not Always Amount to Arguing.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):659-668.
Giving Reasons Does Not Always Amount to Arguing.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):659-668.
Why Thinking Critically is Important.John Capps & Donald Capps - 2009 - In You've Got to be Kidding! Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 1–12.
Acting and believing on the basis of reasons.Christopher Blake-Turner - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 17 (1):e12797.
Reasons as Reasons for Preferences.R. A. Rowland - 2022 - American Philosophical Quarterly 59 (3):297-311.
A “Good” Explanation of Five Puzzles about Reasons.Stephen Finlay - 2019 - Philosophical Perspectives 33 (1):62-104.
The Epistemic Norm of Inference and Non-Epistemic Reasons for Belief.Patrick Bondy - 2019 - Synthese (2):1-21.
Deflationary Pluralism about Motivating Reasons.Daniel Fogal - 2018 - In Veli Mitova (ed.), The Factive Turn in Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.
Can the Epistemic Basing Relation be a Brain Process?Dwayne Moore - 2023 - Global Philosophy 33 (2):1-19.
Reasons and Normativity in Critical Thinking.Guðmundur Heiðar Frímannsson - 2015 - Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi 4 (1):3-16.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-15
Downloads
2 (#1,807,551)
6 months
1 (#1,477,342)
2023-06-15
Downloads
2 (#1,807,551)
6 months
1 (#1,477,342)
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-cc9fg uwo