Watson’s Reciprocity of Rights and Duties

Environmental Ethics 1 (4):353-355 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Richard A. Watson’s proposal that rights inhere only in those who can perform duties is here objected to as being too intellectualistic. Instead, it is suggested that rights inhere in all those who participate in the process of becoming, as A. N. Whitehead proposed half a century ago. Ecological science lends new support to this view.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Correlativity.Ronen Perry - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (6):537 - 584.
A bundle of software rights and duties.David M. Douglas - 2011 - Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):185-197.
Why universal welfare rights are impossible and what it means.Danny Frederick - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (4):428-445.
The rights and duties of childrearing.Peter Vallentyne - 2003 - William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 11:991-1010.
Rights and duties.Carl Wellman (ed.) - 2002 - New York: Routledge.
On assigning rights to animals and nature.Anthony J. Povilitis - 1980 - Environmental Ethics 2 (1):67-71.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#313,643)

6 months
6 (#529,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references