10 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Thomas Richardson [12]Thomas J. Richardson [1]
  1. Data-mining probabilists or experimental determinists.Thomas Richardson, Laura Schulz & Alison Gopnik - 2007 - In Alison Gopnik & Laura Schulz (eds.), Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation. Oxford University Press. pp. 208--230.
  2. Ancestral Graph Markov Models.Thomas Richardson & Peter Spirtes - unknown
    This paper introduces a class of graphical independence models that is closed under marginalization and conditioning but that contains all DAG independence models. This class of graphs, called maximal ancestral graphs, has two attractive features: there is at most one edge between each pair of vertices; every missing edge corresponds to an independence relation. These features lead to a simple parameterization of the corresponding set of distributions in the Gaussian case.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  3.  30
    Causal inference in the presence of latent variables and selection bias.Peter Spirtes, Christopher Meek & Thomas Richardson - unknown
    Whenever the use of non-experimental data for discovering causal relations or predicting the outcomes of experiments or interventions is contemplated, two difficulties are routinely faced. One is the problem of latent variables, or confounders: factors influencing two or more measured variables may not themselves have been measured or recorded. The other is the problem of sample selection bias: values of the variables or features under study may themselves influence whether a unit is included in the data sample.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  4.  33
    Automated discovery of linear feedback models.Thomas Richardson - unknown
    The introduction of statistical models represented by directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) has proved fruitful in the construction of expert systems, in allowing efficient updating algorithms that take advantage of conditional independence relations (Pearl, 1988, Lauritzen et al. 1993), and in inferring causal structure from conditional independence relations (Spirtes and Glymour, 1991, Spirtes, Glymour and Scheines, 1993, Pearl and Verma, 1991, Cooper, 1992). As a framework for representing the combination of causal and statistical hypotheses, DAG models have shed light on a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  5.  23
    Towards characterizing Markov equivalence classes for directed acyclic graphs with latent variables.Ayesha Ali, Thomas Richardson, Peter Spirtes & Jiji Zhang - unknown
    It is well known that there may be many causal explanations that are consistent with a given set of data. Recent work has been done to represent the common aspects of these explanations into one representation. In this paper, we address what is less well known: how do the relationships common to every causal explanation among the observed variables of some DAG process change in the presence of latent variables? Ancestral graphs provide a class of graphs that can encode conditional (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6.  41
    Using path diagrams as a structural equation modelling tool.Peter Spirtes, Thomas Richardson, Chris Meek & Richard Scheines - unknown
    Linear structural equation models (SEMs) are widely used in sociology, econometrics, biology, and other sciences. A SEM (without free parameters) has two parts: a probability distribution (in the Normal case specified by a set of linear structural equations and a covariance matrix among the “error” or “disturbance” terms), and an associated path diagram corresponding to the functional composition of variables specified by the structural equations and the correlations among the error terms. It is often thought that the path diagram is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  40
    An Evaluation of Machine-Learning Methods for Predicting Pneumonia Mortality.Gregory F. Cooper, Constantin F. Aliferis, Richard Ambrosino, John Aronis, Bruce G. Buchanon, Richard Caruana, Michael J. Fine, Clark Glymour, Geoffrey Gordon, Barbara H. Hanusa, Janine E. Janosky, Christopher Meek, Tom Mitchell, Thomas Richardson & Peter Spirtes - unknown
    This paper describes the application of eight statistical and machine-learning methods to derive computer models for predicting mortality of hospital patients with pneumonia from their findings at initial presentation. The eight models were each constructed based on 9847 patient cases and they were each evaluated on 4352 additional cases. The primary evaluation metric was the error in predicted survival as a function of the fraction of patients predicted to survive. This metric is useful in assessing a model’s potential to assist (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  22
    Parameterizing and Scoring Mixed Ancestral Graphs.Thomas Richardson & Peter Spirtes - unknown
    Thomas Richardson and Peter Spirtes. Parameterizing and Scoring Mixed Ancestral Graphs.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  27
    Scoring Ancestral Graph Models.Thomas Richardson & Peter Spirtes - unknown
    Thomas Richardson and Peter Spirtes. Scoring Ancestral Graph Models.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  58
    Using d-separation to calculate zero partial correlations in linear models with correlated errors.Peter Spirtes, Thomas Richardson, Christopher Meek, Richard Scheines & Clark Glymour - unknown
    It has been shown in Spirtes(1995) that X and Y are d-separated given Z in a directed graph associated with a recursive or non-recursive linear model without correlated errors if and only if the model entails that ρXY.Z = 0. This result cannot be directly applied to a linear model with correlated errors, however, because the standard graphical representation of a linear model with correlated errors is not a directed graph. The main result of this paper is to show how (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation