4 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Stanislav M. Gavrilenko [3]Stanislav Gavrilenko [3]
  1.  10
    The Vienna Circle: A Paradoxical Heritage.Stanislav M. Gavrilenko - 2024 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 61 (1):35-43.
    The proposed text develops a number of provisions of N.I. Kuznetsova’s article “Oxymoron of the Vienna Circle”. Special attention is paid to the intellectual heritage of the Vienna Circle, which is in many ways paradoxical – rejected and simultaneously operational.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  10
    Historical epistemology.Stanislav Gavrilenko - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):20-28.
    This article attempts to define a historical epistemology not as separate place in disciplinary space, but as rather specific area, which unstable configuration and “stuff" are determined by quite different from philosophy ways of talking and investigation of knowledge, especially in social sciences. More significant than emergence of competitors of philosophy in production of knowledge about knowledge (sociology, history, anthropology) was that they introduce a new regime of this production. This regime became empirical. Within that regime knowledge is objectified not (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Rossiiskaia sotsiologiia: avtonomiia pod voprosom.Aleksandr Bikbov & Stanislav Gavrilenko - 2002 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 5 (6):162-185.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  12
    Technoscience, Biopolitics and Biobanking.Stanislav M. Gavrilenko - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (1):38-44.
    The author considers two additions to analysis of technoscience, suggested by Olga Koshovets and Igor Frolov. First, technoscience is not just regime of knowledge production, which brings into play enormous technological and organizational resources, but is a regime, regulated by mandatory requirement to produce knowledge, which should be transformed into endowed with market value goods and services (technoobjects). Second, technoscience is an ever-faster colonization of natural and social worlds by technoobjects. In the author's view, the main problem with technoscience is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark