16 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Michael H. Birnbaum [14]Michael Birnbaum [2]
  1.  23
    New paradoxes of risky decision making.Michael H. Birnbaum - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (2):463-501.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  2.  17
    Morality judgments: Tests of an averaging model.Michael H. Birnbaum - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):35.
  3.  8
    Evaluation of the priority heuristic as a descriptive model of risky decision making: Comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006).Michael Birnbaum - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (1):253-260.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  4.  37
    The nonadditivity of personality impressions.Michael H. Birnbaum - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):543.
  5.  6
    Postscript: Rejoinder to Brandstätter et al. (2008).Michael Birnbaum - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (1):260-262.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  6.  16
    Compensatory effects in moral judgment: Two rights don't make up for a wrong.Dwight R. Riskey & Michael H. Birnbaum - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (1):171.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  7.  74
    Testing transitivity in choice under risk.Michael H. Birnbaum & Ulrich Schmidt - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (4):599-614.
    Recently proposed models of risky choice imply systematic violations of transitivity of preference. This study explored whether people show the predicted intransitivity of the two models proposed to account for the certainty effect in Allais paradoxes. In order to distinguish “true” violations from those produced by “error,” a model was fit in which each choice can have a different error rate and each person can have a different pattern of preferences that need not be transitive. Error rate for a choice (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8.  14
    Contextual effects in information integration.Michael H. Birnbaum, Allen Parducci & Robert K. Gifford - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (2):158.
  9.  13
    Subjective correlation and the size-numerosity illusion.Michael H. Birnbaum, Marc Kobernick & Clairice T. Veit - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):537.
  10. Decision and choice: Paradoxes of choice.Michael H. Birnbaum - 2001 - In N. J. Smelser & B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. pp. 3286--3291.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  19
    Empirical evaluation of third-generation prospect theory.Michael H. Birnbaum - 2018 - Theory and Decision 84 (1):11-27.
    Third generation prospect theory is a theory of choices and of judgments of highest buying and lowest selling prices of risky prospects, i.e., of willingness to pay and willingness to accept. The gap between WTP and WTA is sometimes called the “endowment effect” and was previously called the “point of view” effect. Third generation prospect theory combines cumulative prospect theory for risky prospects with the theory that judged values are based on the integration of price paid or price received with (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  12
    Limitations of the physical correlate theory of psychophysical judgment.Michael H. Birnbaum - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (2):190-191.
  13.  33
    Philosophical criteria for psychological explanation.Michael H. Birnbaum - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (6):562-565.
  14.  8
    Transitivity in the Big Ten.Michael H. Birnbaum - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (4):351-353.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  8
    Testing mixture models of transitive preference: Comment on Regenwetter, Dana, and Davis-Stober (2011).Michael H. Birnbaum - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (4):675-683.
  16.  16
    To resolve Fechner versus Stevens: Settle the dispute concerning “ratios” and “differences”.Michael H. Birnbaum - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (2):270-271.