6 found
Order:
  1.  7
    Predatory War, Drones and Torture: Remapping the Body in Pain.Kevin McSorley - 2019 - Body and Society 25 (3):73-99.
    Elaine Scarry argues in The Body in Pain that war is a vast and reciprocal swearing on the body, with corporeality key not only to its brutal prosecution but also to the eventual ending of the political ‘crisis of substantiation’ that war entails. However, her work has not been extensively explored with reference to significant transformations in the embodied experiences of contemporary warfare. This article thus analyses a particular articulation of late modern warfare that I term predatory war, whose current (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  16
    War and the body: militarisation, practice and experience.Kevin McSorley (ed.) - 2013 - New York, NY: Routledge.
    This edited volume places the body at the centre of critical thinking about war and its consequences. War is fundamentally embodied.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Cosmopolitanism, violence and embodiment.Kevin McSorley - 2015 - In Anastasia Marinopoulou (ed.), Cosmopolitan modernity. New York: Peter Lang.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  86
    Discourses of the digital divide.Kevin McSorley - 2001 - The Philosophers' Magazine 14 (14):32-33.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. The fangs behind the mask : everyday life in wartime Chechnya.Kevin McSorley - 2015 - In Christine Sylvester (ed.), Masquerades of war. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  27
    The secular salvation story of the digital divide.Kevin McSorley - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (2):75-87.
    Despite much discussion of thedigital divide, little academic work hasdirectly analyzed the specific political andpolicy contexts in which the concept is beingdeveloped and deployed. This paper undertakesan analysis of one such initiative, theactivity of the supranational DigitalOpportunity Task Force (DOT Force). Theanalysis provides a critical discursiveanalysis of the final report of the DOT Force,together with thick description of theprocesses by which it was produced. Theresolution of numerous antagonisms between theparticipants in the narrative of the finalreport reflects the field of power (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark