6 found
Order:
  1. Sluicing and logical form.Sandra Chung, William A. Ladusaw & James McCloskey - 1995 - Natural Language Semantics 3 (3):239-282.
    This paper presents a novel analysis of Sluicing, an ellipsis construction first described by Ross (1969) and illustrated by the bracketed portion ofI want to do something, but I'm just not sure [what _]. Starting from the assumption that a sluice consists of a displaced Wh-constituent and an empty IP, we show how simple and general LF operations fill out the empty IP and thereby provide it with an interpretable Logical Form. The LF operations we appeal to rely on the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  2.  27
    Commentary: Convicting the innocent.James Mccloskey - 1989 - Criminal Justice Ethics 8 (1):2-59.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  25
    Commentary: The death penalty: A personal view.James McCloskey - 1996 - Criminal Justice Ethics 15 (2):2-75.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Ethics in context.James Mccloskey, Douglas N. Husak, Michael Goldman & Sidney Gendin - 1989 - Criminal Justice Ethics 8 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  82
    Chomsky Noam. Lectures on government and binding. The Pisa lectures. Studies in generative grammar, no. 9. Foris Publications, Dordrecht and Cinnaminson, N.J., 1981, ix + 371 pp.Chomsky Noam. Lectures on government and binding. The Pisa lectures. Second edition of the preceding. Studies in generative grammar, no. 9. Foris Publications, Dordrecht and Cinnaminson, N.J., 1982, ix + 371 pp. [REVIEW]James McCloskey - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1):238-240.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  11
    Review: Noam Chomsky, Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures; Noam Chomsky, Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures. [REVIEW]James McCloskey - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1):238-240.