Remarks to the effect that a correct answer depends upon a correct question —that from a misleading question there can result only a misleading answer—are common today. In fact, one might suspect that such common concentration on finding the right questions has something to do with what seems to be an uncommon lack of answers. This concentration on the importance of asking the right questions can be applied to the interpretation of biblical literature. For here, certainly, the questions asked are (...) often decisive. They guide the inquiry by setting the terms of the search and, in this sense, they determine at least the kind of answers that will be given. Further, they often disclose the presuppositions with which one is working. (shrink)

Name der Zeitschrift: Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook Jahrgang: 2013 Heft: 1 Seiten: 131-142.

Some politely do not ask. Others succumb: “Are you still working with Kierkegaard?” Still. But not still. For Kierkegaard will not be still. The ferment in Kierkegaard studies is remarkable. There is some zeroing in; there is much widening out: concentric circles, Kierkegaard the catylist. So much of what we once “knew” about Kierkegaard we do not know anymore. Cause for lamentation or celebration–or both? Again and again, Jon Stewart takes from us—with the deliberation of a police officer writing a (...) traffic ticket—tried and true anchors in understanding. (shrink)