- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The normativity of philosophical discourse: pro et contra
Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought) 5:6-20 (2019)
Abstract
One of the main vocations of scientific communication is to find points of fruitful theoretical debate - those features of ideas, argumentation, established ideas that can become the source of new intellectual pursuits and conceptual assets. Acceptance of differences of positions, giving impulse to view too commonplace - that served as an impulse for raising the question of the normativity of philosophical discourse.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Expressivism and Convention-Relativism about Epistemic Discourse.Allan Hazlett - forthcoming - In A. Fairweather & O. Flanagan (eds.), Naturalizing Epistemic Virtue. Cambridge University Press.
Biological Function and Epistemic Normativity.Ema Sullivan-Bissett - 2017 - Philosophical Explorations 20 (1):94-110.
Intentionality and Normativity.Maxime Doyon - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (2):279-295.
On Broome’s Notion of Normativity.Thomas Presskorn-Thygesen - 2020 - Australasian Philosophical Review 4 (4):373-378.
Focusing on normativity in language and sexuality studies: Insights from conversations on objectophilia.Heiko Motschenbacher - 2014 - Critical Discourse Studies 11 (1):49-70.
Dear Prudence: the nature and normativity of prudential discourse.Guy Fletcher - 2021 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Arguments «pro et contra» lustration in Central and Eastern Europe in the contemporary scientific discourse.N. Y. Minenkova - 2016 - Granì 19 (9).
Normativity and the material effects of discourse.Allan Luke - 2005 - Critical Discourse Studies 2 (2):198-201.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-01-10
Downloads
10 (#1,213,296)
6 months
8 (#406,823)
2023-01-10
Downloads
10 (#1,213,296)
6 months
8 (#406,823)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Reception and influence in the history of philosophy: an approach to the problem.Serhii Yosypenko - 2020 - Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought) 2:6-23.
Philosophical understanding of prospects of the codification of language as a factor of science development.Oleh Kubalskyi - 2022 - Filosofska Dumka (Philosophical Thought) 2:125-136.
More than the Interview”. Overview of the section “Oral History of Philosophy” in the Journal “Filosofska Dumka.Serhii Yosypenko - 2019 - Sententiae 38 (2):86-97.
Scientific Seminar of the Student Society of Oral History of Philosophy.Amina Kkhelufi - 2019 - Sententiae 38 (2):215-217.
Більше ніж інтерв’ю». Огляд тематичного блоку «усна історія філософії» часопису «філософська думка.Сергій Йосипенко - 2019 - Sententiae 38 (2):86-97.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-747975fc64-ttfh4 uwo