The philosophy of human learning

New York: Routledge (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Christopher Winch launches a vigorous Wittgensteinian attack on both the "romantic" Rousseauian and the "scientific" cognitivist traditions in learning theory. These two schools, he argues, are more closely related than is commonly realized.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
205 (#99,886)

6 months
2 (#1,240,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Winch
King's College London

Citations of this work

Epistemology of Education.J. Adam Carter & Ben Kotzee - forthcoming - Oxford Bibliographies Online.
Philosophy, Neuroscience and Education.John Clark - 2015 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (1):36-46.
Philosophical accounts of learning.Paul Hager - 2005 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (5):649–666.
Wittgenstein, Social Views and Intransitive Learning.Steinar Bøyum - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (3):491-506.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references