What Else Films Can Do: A Response to Bruce Russell

Film and Philosophy:27-34 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cahiers du cinéma, the 1950s: neo-realism, Hollywood, new wave.Jim Hillier (ed.) - 1985 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ariadne at the movies.John Dilworth - 2003 - Contemporary Aesthetics 1.
Horror Films and the Argument from Reactive Attitudes.Scott Woodcock - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):309-324.
Existential Themes in the Films of Alfred Hitchcock.Sander H. Lee - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:225-244.
Beyond mere illustration: How films can be philosophy.Thomas E. Wartenberg - 2006 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (1):19–32.
Brute rationality.Bruce Russell - 2007 - Philosophical Books 48 (2):150-154.
Beetle Boxes.Bruce Russell - 1975 - Teaching Philosophy 1 (2):153-157.
Still a live issue.Bruce Russell - 1978 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (3):278-281.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-20

Downloads
7 (#1,409,222)

6 months
4 (#859,620)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas E. Wartenberg
Mount Holyoke College

Citations of this work

Are There Definite Objections to Film as Philosophy? Metaphilosophical Considerations.Diana Neiva - 2019 - In Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven S. Gouveia (eds.), Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides. Nova Iorque, NY, Estados Unidos: Routledge Press, Research on Aesthetics. pp. 116-134.
Film as Philosophy: In Defense of a Bold Thesis.Aaron Smuts - 2009 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (3):409-420.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references