Giving flesh to a "straw man": A reply to Feeney, Pittman, and Wagner

Psychological Review 81 (6):540-542 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):87-105.
Tortuous dualism.Michael Levin - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (6):313-22.
Two Forms of the Straw Man.Robert Talisse & Scott F. Aikin - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):345-352.
Paradox lost, paradox regained: Reply from a flagellated straw man.James V. Bradley - 1983 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (1):69-72.
Wagner und Hanslick. Kurze Geschichte einer Feindschaft.Christian Jung - 2012 - Österreichische Musikzeitschrift 67 (6):14-21.
Écart: Reply to Lefort's “Flesh and Otherness”.M. C. Dillon - 1990 - In Galen A. Johnson & Michael B. Smith (eds.), Ontology and Alterity in Merleau-Ponty. Northwestern University Press. pp. 14--26.
Mission impossible: giving flesh to the phantom public.M. Jaffrennou & T. Coduys - 2005 - In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public. MIT Press. pp. 218--223.
Scruton's Wagner on God, salvation, and Eros.Fiona Ellis - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2):169-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
11 (#1,155,335)

6 months
2 (#1,236,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references