Affirming a Straw Man: A Reply to Bowles [Book Review]

Argumentation 13 (1):17-26 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/a:1007737330129

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Straw Men, Weak Men, and Hollow Men.Scott F. Aikin & John Casey - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):87-105.
How Often Do We (Philosophy Professors) Commit the Straw Man Fallacy?Brian Ribeiro - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (1):27-38.
Affirming the consequent.George Bowles - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (4):429-444.
The non-significance of straw man arguments.Niels G. Waller & Wesley O. Johnson - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):226-227.
Tortuous dualism.Michael Levin - 1995 - Journal of Philosophy 92 (6):313-22.
Burning straw men sheds little light: A reply to Whiting and Kelly.Mark Wilkinson - 1997 - Acta Biotheoretica 45 (1):17-27.
Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation.Marcin Lewiński - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):469-497.
Two forms of the straw man.Robert Talisse with Scott Aikin - manuscript
Demolishing a 'Straw Man'.Elliott J. Rosen - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (2):207-208.
Conversing with straw men while ignoring dictators: A reply to Roger Ames.Jack Donnelly - 1997 - Ethics and International Affairs 11:207–213.
Economic man – or straw man?Ken Binmore - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):817-818.
Response to “This Porridge Is Too Thin” by Gretchen M. Brown and “Demolishing a 'Straw Man'” by Elliott J. Rosen. [REVIEW]Felicia Ackerman - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):323-325.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-11

Downloads
25 (#638,257)

6 months
4 (#799,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
The aim and structure of physical theory.Pierre Maurice Marie Duhem - 1954 - Princeton,: Princeton University Press.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. V. O. Quine - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 202-220.

View all 16 references / Add more references