Is There an Art of Judicial Reasoning at the General Court? Some Modest Comments

In Knut Almestad, Jean-Luc Baechler, Benedikt Bogason, Henrik Bull, Francis Delaporte, Luis José Diez Canseco Núñez, Peter Freeman, Vladimir Golitsyn, Irmgard Griss, Marc Jaeger, Koen Lenaerts, Paul Mahoney, Andreas Mundt, Sven Norberg, Toril Marie Øie, Þorgeir Örlygsson, Anne-José Paulsen, Georges Ravarani, Hubertus Schumacher, Vassilios Skouris, Gian-Flurin Steinegger, Sven Erik Svedman, Antonio Tizzano, Marc van der Woude, Bo Vesterdorf & Jean-Claude Wiwinius (eds.), The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 273-279 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The art of judicial reasoning is a serious and complex topic that has been the subject of numerous learned studies and commentaries. It is complex because it alludes to a wide range of disciplines: logic, hermeneutics, morality, and ethics. Seen from a wider perspective, it also relates to the sociology of law and, perhaps, the anthropology of the judicial profession.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/978-3-030-02553-3_20

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Judicial Reasoning in a Multinational Court.Bo Vesterdorf - 2019 - In Knut Almestad, Jean-Luc Baechler, Benedikt Bogason, Henrik Bull, Francis Delaporte, Luis José Diez Canseco Núñez, Peter Freeman, Vladimir Golitsyn, Irmgard Griss, Marc Jaeger, Koen Lenaerts, Paul Mahoney, Andreas Mundt, Sven Norberg, Toril Marie Øie, Þorgeir Örlygsson, Anne-José Paulsen, Georges Ravarani, Hubertus Schumacher, Vassilios Skouris, Gian-Flurin Steinegger, Sven Erik Svedman, Antonio Tizzano, Marc van der Woude, Bo Vesterdorf & Jean-Claude Wiwinius (eds.), The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 259-271.
Formal aspects of Legal reasoning.A. Soeteman - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):731-746.
The Us Supreme Court and the Modern Common Law Approach.Simona Grossi - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
The Acceptability of the Rulings of the European Court of Human Rights.Paul Mahoney - 2019 - In Knut Almestad, Jean-Luc Baechler, Benedikt Bogason, Henrik Bull, Francis Delaporte, Luis José Diez Canseco Núñez, Peter Freeman, Vladimir Golitsyn, Irmgard Griss, Marc Jaeger, Koen Lenaerts, Paul Mahoney, Andreas Mundt, Sven Norberg, Toril Marie Øie, Þorgeir Örlygsson, Anne-José Paulsen, Georges Ravarani, Hubertus Schumacher, Vassilios Skouris, Gian-Flurin Steinegger, Sven Erik Svedman, Antonio Tizzano, Marc van der Woude, Bo Vesterdorf & Jean-Claude Wiwinius (eds.), The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 105-124.
Argumentación y razonamiento judicial.Victoria Iturralde - 1992 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 7 (1-3):1049-1078.
Comparing Judicial Activism – Can we say that the US Supreme Court is more Activist than the German Constitutional Court?Garoupa Nuno - 2016 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 72 (4):1089-1106.
The constitutional court's decision in the dispute between the supreme court and the judicial commission: Banishing judicial accountability?Simon Butt - unknown
The Figuring of Morality in Adjudication: Not so Special?Bebhinn Donnelly-Lazarov - 2011 - Ratio Juris 24 (3):284-303.
Joint Dispute Settlement and Judicial Interpretation – A Precondition for Participation in the EU Internal Market?Sven Norberg - 2019 - In Knut Almestad, Jean-Luc Baechler, Benedikt Bogason, Henrik Bull, Francis Delaporte, Luis José Diez Canseco Núñez, Peter Freeman, Vladimir Golitsyn, Irmgard Griss, Marc Jaeger, Koen Lenaerts, Paul Mahoney, Andreas Mundt, Sven Norberg, Toril Marie Øie, Þorgeir Örlygsson, Anne-José Paulsen, Georges Ravarani, Hubertus Schumacher, Vassilios Skouris, Gian-Flurin Steinegger, Sven Erik Svedman, Antonio Tizzano, Marc van der Woude, Bo Vesterdorf & Jean-Claude Wiwinius (eds.), The Art of Judicial Reasoning: Festschrift in Honour of Carl Baudenbacher. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 175-189.
Do judges have an obligation to enforce the law?: moral responsibility and judicial reasoning.Anthony R. Reeves - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (2):159-187.
Defeasibility in Judicial Opinion: Logical or Procedural?David Godden & Douglas Walton - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):6-19.
The Responsible judge: readings in judicial ethics.John Thomas Noonan & Kenneth I. Winston (eds.) - 1993 - Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
Judicial Review Without Rights: Some Problems for the Democratic Legitimacy of Structural Judicial Review.Adrienne Stone - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (1):1-32.
Law school curriculum, training law students, and the vitality of the profession: The judicial perspective - a panel discussion.Judicial Panel - manuscript
On the study of judicial behaviors: Of law, politics, science and humility.Stephen B. Burbank - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-07

Downloads
5 (#1,543,447)

6 months
3 (#982,484)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references