Argumentación y razonamiento judicial

Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 7 (1-3):1049-1078 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to ofter a general view of the development of the issue about judicial reasoning and argumentation in Europe. I start with a mention to the methodological problem in law, and after that I expose the main models about the so called “legal argumentation theories”. Thirdly, I bring out some general thesis about judicial reasoning, and finally I propose some critical reflections about those theories.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

04954548

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Argumentación y razonamiento judicial.Victoria Iturralde Sesma - 1992 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 7 (1-3):1049-1078.
Virtudes, argumentación jurídica y ética judicial.Amalia Amaya - 2011 - Dianoia 56 (67):135-142.
Formal aspects of Legal reasoning.A. Soeteman - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):731-746.
Elementos doctrinales para el estudio de la argumentación como eje del control judicial.Ivan Vargas-Chaves - 2014 - Prolegómenos 16 (32):235-246.
La argumentación judicial: control y responsabilidad de los órganos jurisdiccionales.Manuel Segura Ortega - 2011 - Telos: Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas 18 (1):197-229.
Judicial Greatness and the Duties of a Judge.Omri Ben-Zvi - 2016 - Law and Philosophy 35 (6):615-654.
Common-law judicial reasoning and analogy.Adam Rigoni - 2014 - Legal Theory 20 (2):133-156.
Defeasibility in Judicial Opinion: Logical or Procedural?David Godden & Douglas Walton - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (1):6-19.
Modern legal theory and judicial impartiality.Ofer Raban - 2003 - Portland, Or.: GlassHouse Press.
Constitutional Rights, Judicial Review, and the Distribution of Benefits.Patricia Gail Smith Milanich - 1982 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Rights-based judicial review: A democratic justification. [REVIEW]Alon Harel - 2003 - Law and Philosophy 22 (s 3-4):247-276.
Do judges have an obligation to enforce the law?: moral responsibility and judicial reasoning.Anthony R. Reeves - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (2):159-187.
“This Argument Fails for Two Reasons…”: A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments. [REVIEW]Davide Mazzi - 2010 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (4):373-385.
A. Olsen A. Ghirardi, Raul E. Fernandez, Armando S. Andruet, Juan C. Ghirardi, La naturaleza del razonamiento judicial, El razonamiento débil. [REVIEW]M. -C. Nagouas - 1995 - Archives de Philosophie du Droit 40:506-506.
Understanding judicial discretion.Barry Hoffmaster - 1982 - Law and Philosophy 1 (1):21 - 55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
42 (#386,300)

6 months
6 (#566,625)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references