The Health Impact Fund and the Right to Participate in the Advancement of Science

European Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1) (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Taking into consideration the extremely harsh public health conditions faced by the majority of the world population, the Health Impact Fund (HIF) proposal seeks to make the intellectual property regimes more in line with human rights obligations. While prioritizing access to medicines and research on neglected diseases, the HIF makes many compromises in order to be conceived as politically feasible and to retain a compensation character that makes its implementation justified solely on basis of negative duties. Despite that current global health realities make such steps reasonable, the paper looks up the negative effects on one overlooked human right: the right to participate in scientific advancement.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sharing in or Benefiting from Scientific Advancement?Cristian Timmermann - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1):111-133.
A Critique in Need of Critique.M. Peterson, A. Hollis & T. Pogge - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (2):178-185.
Are pharmaceutical patents protected by human rights?Joseph Millum - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):e25-e25.
Poverty, negative duties and the global institutional order.Magnus Reitberger - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):379-402.
Human rights,cultural pluralism, and international health research.Patricia A. Marshall - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (6):529-557.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-05-03

Downloads
282 (#71,902)

6 months
65 (#73,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cristian Timmermann
Universität Augsburg

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references