Narcissistic Attachments

Environmental Philosophy 14 (1):101-118 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay examines the relationship between human and non­human animals in the context of de-extinction projects. Following van Dooren and Rose’s (2015) suggestion that de-extinction projects are reluctant to engage with mourning work, I argue that these scientific endeavours can be understood as inherently melancholic. In reading them as such, I focus on the concepts of identification and ambivalence central to Freud’s theorisation of melancholia, and argue that looking at these key ideas in relation to de-extinction reveals the way that notions of human exceptionalism can be problematized by a psychoanalytic reading of these projects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Narcissistic Attachments.Emily Thew - 2017 - Environmental Philosophy 14 (1):101-118.
Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Mammoths? De-extinction and Animal Welfare.Heather Browning - 2018 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (6):785-803.
De-extinction and Deep Questions About Species Conservation.Christian Diehm - 2017 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 20 (1):25-28.
Wild Dog Dreaming: Love and Extinction.Meg Mott - 2011 - Environmental Philosophy 8 (2):203-205.
Richard Grusin, ed. After Extinction.Brett Buchanan - 2019 - Environmental Philosophy 16 (1):238-240.
Ethics and Human–Animal Relations: Review Essay. [REVIEW]Anna Peterson - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (4):1-14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-29

Downloads
29 (#568,517)

6 months
1 (#1,515,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references