Why so complicated?

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):47-51 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the article, author criticizes some points made by S.M. Gavrilenko regarding the status of historical epistemology and other social and humanitarian disciplines. Here the author relies mainly on the French tradition of historical epistemology, as well as emphasizes the need to keep clear the disciplinary boundaries between epistemology, philosophy of science, history and sociology of science.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

1811833X

DOI

10.5840/eps201752228

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On the meaning of historical epistemology for contemporary philosophy of science.Ekaterina Shashlova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):42-46.
The crisis of representations.Lada Shipovalova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):171-187.
Historical epistemology.Alexander Pisarev - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):34-39.
A priori and the Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]Tatiana Sokolova - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):225-231.
“Wonderland” of theoretical epistemology.Natalia Kuznetsova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):221-229.
Historical epistemology: necessary complications.Stanislav Gavrilenko - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):52-55.
On Problems and Specifics of Philosophy of History.В.С Кржевов - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):37-45.
Production of knowledge about the knowledge.Olga Koshovets - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):40-46.
Contra relativism.Taras Varkhotov - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):33-38.
History as a Real Process: Historical Science and Philosophy of History.Ю.И Семенов - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):50-56.
Who needs an optimistic philosophy of history?В.Н Порус - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):57-61.
Gaston Bachelard and the Topicality of Historical Epistemology.Т.Д Соколова - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 48 (2):209-219.
«It is logic, but not thinking» (N. Bohr).Igor Dmitriev - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):39-41.
Historical epistemology.Stanislav Gavrilenko - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 52 (2):20-28.
The crisis of representations.Lada Shipovalova - 2017 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 51 (1):171-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-29

Downloads
8 (#1,320,049)

6 months
6 (#524,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tatiana Sokolova
Russian Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references