social freedom as the purpose of the modern university

Philosophy and Theory in Higher Education 4 (1):1-23 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the fundamental purpose that justifies the existence of the modern university? The answer proposed in this essay is the promotion of social freedom. The essay begins by distinguishing social freedom from negative freedom and reflective freedom along the lines proposed by other theorists of social freedom, such as Frederick Neuhouser and Axel Honneth. After noting the need for a more developed account of the university than has so far been provided by these other theorists, the essay analyses the various dimensions in which universities have, at their best, promoted social freedom. The essay then explains why it is through the promotion of social, as distinct from negative or reflective freedom, that universities fulfil their purpose. It concludes with some reflections on how this understanding of the purpose of the university fits an “immanent” model of social criticism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Evolving Social Purpose of Academic Freedom.Shannon Dea - 2021 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 31 (2):199-222.
Development as Freedom.Andrew Gamble - 2003 - Common Knowledge 9 (2):350-350.
Academic Freedom, the University, and Public Accountability.Zdenko Kodelja - 2018 - In Ann Chinnery, Nuraan Davids, Naomi Hodgson, Kai Horsthemke, Viktor Johansson, Dirk Willem Postma, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Paul Smeyers, Christiane Thompson, Joris Vlieghe, Hanan Alexander, Joop Berding, Charles Bingham, Michael Bonnett, David Bridges, Malte Brinkmann, Brian A. Brown, Carsten Bünger, Nicholas C. Burbules, Rita Casale, M. Victoria Costa, Brian Coyne, Renato Huarte Cuéllar, Stefaan E. Cuypers, Johan Dahlbeck, Suzanne de Castell, Doret de Ruyter, Samantha Deane, Sarah J. DesRoches, Eduardo Duarte, Denise Egéa, Penny Enslin, Oren Ergas, Lynn Fendler, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Norm Friesen, Amanda Fulford, Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Stefan Herbrechter, Chris Higgins, Pádraig Hogan, Katariina Holma, Liz Jackson, Ronald B. Jacobson, Jennifer Jenson, Kerstin Jergus, Clarence W. Joldersma, Mark E. Jonas, Zdenko Kodelja, Wendy Kohli, Anna Kouppanou, Heikki A. Kovalainen, Lesley Le Grange, David Lewin, Tyson E. Lewis, Gerard Lum, Niclas Månsson, Christopher Martin & Jan Masschelein (eds.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 1293-1305.
Social Science and Social Purpose. [REVIEW]F. F. Centore - 1969 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 18:247-249.
Academic freedom: an ultra-modern principle with old roots.Li Bennich-Bjorkman - 2016 - Філософія Освіти 18 (1):125-135.
Stoic Minimalism: ‘Just Enough Stoicism’ for Modern Practitioners.Chuck Chakrapani - 2022 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 9 (1):11-29.
Kant and a culture of freedom.Ana Marta González - 2010 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 96 (3):291-308.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-17

Downloads
335 (#61,219)

6 months
191 (#15,215)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas H Smith
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references