- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators
Science Education 83 (4):493-509 (1999)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Further thoughts on defining versus describing the nature of science: A response to Niaz.Lawrence C. Scharmann & Mike U. Smith - 2001 - Science Education 85 (6):691-693.
Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science.Michael R. Matthews - 1994 - Routledge.
The misrepresentation of science by philosophers and teachers of science.Garth D. Benson - 1989 - Synthese 80 (1):107 - 119.
Preservice teachers 'classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science.Vicente Mellado - 1997 - Science & Education 6 (4):331-354.
The Potential of Perspectivism for Science Education.Jacob V. Pearce - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (5):531-545.
Describing teachers' conceptual ecologies for the nature of science.Sherry A. Southerland, Adam Johnston & Scott Sowell - 2006 - Science Education 90 (5):874-906.
Locus of control: A discriminator of the ability to foster an understanding of the nature of science among preservice elementary teachers.Lawrence C. Scharmann - 1988 - Science Education 72 (4):453-465.
Preservice science teachers reflect on their practicum experiences.Isil Koc - 2012 - Educational Studies 38 (1):31-38.
Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers.Deborah Pomeroy - 1993 - Science Education 77 (3):261-278.
Educating the educators.Massimo Pigliucci - 2002 - In R. Dawkins (ed.), Darwin Day Collection One: Single Best Idea, Ever. Tangled Bank Press.
The pedagogical implications of teacher personal philosophies of science in the school science classroom : an interpretive study.Catherine E. Milne - unknown
Study of classroom practice and classroom contexts amongst senior high school biology teachers in Harare, Zimbabwe.Eric M. Gwimbi & Martin Monk - 2003 - Science Education 87 (2):207-223.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-25
Downloads
16 (#925,932)
6 months
1 (#1,501,182)
2014-03-25
Downloads
16 (#925,932)
6 months
1 (#1,501,182)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science for Science Education.Gürol Irzık, Gurol Irzik & Robert Nola - 2011 - Science & Education 20 (7-8):591-607.
International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching.Michael R. Matthews (ed.) - 2014 - Springer.
Current Status of Research in Teaching and Learning Evolution: II. Pedagogical Issues.Mike U. Smith - 2010 - Science & Education 19 (6-8):539-571.
Progressive transitions in chemistry teachers’ understanding of nature of science based on historical controversies.Mansoor Niaz - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (1):43-65.
Current Status of Research in Teaching and Learning Evolution: I. Philosophical/Epistemological Issues.Mike U. Smith - 2010 - Science & Education 19 (6-8):523-538.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-747975fc64-2hs6p uwo