Review: Clark Glymour, Discussion: Hypothetico-Deductivism is Hopeless; C. Kenneth Waters, Relevance Logic Brings Hope to Hypothetico-Deductivism; Thomas R. Grimes, Discussion: Truth, Content, and the Hypothetico-Deductive Method [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (2):756-758 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Horwich, Hempel, and hypothetico-deductivism.Ken Gemes - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):699-702.
Hypothetico-deductivism is hopeless.Clark Glymour - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (2):322-325.
Glymour on evidential relevance.David Christensen - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (3):471-481.
Truth, content, and the hypothetico-deductive method.Thomas R. Grimes - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (3):514-522.
Glymour on confirmation.Aron Edidin - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (2):292-307.
Popper and hypothetico-deductivism.Alan Musgrave - 2004 - In Dov M. Gabbay, John Woods & Akihiro Kanamori (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Elsevier. pp. 10--205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
12 (#1,088,509)

6 months
2 (#1,203,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Skyrms
University of California, Irvine

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references