Can we really leave gender out of it? Individual differences and the Simulation of Smiles model

&
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):459-460 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Gender differences in face-based emotion recognition, notably differential use of mimicry, may compromise the extent to which the Simulation of Smiles (SIMS) model can be generalized to populations besides the adult females on which it has been tested. Much work indicates sex differences in face-based emotion recognition, including smile recognition

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0140525x10001342

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Simulation of Smiles (SIMS) model: Embodied simulation and the meaning of facial expression.Paula M. Niedenthal, Martial Mermillod, Marcus Maringer & Ursula Hess - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):417.
New Research, Old Problems: Methodological and Ethical Issues in fMRI Research Examining Sex/Gender Differences in Emotion Processing.Robyn Bluhm - 2011 - Neuroethics 6 (2):319-330.
A simulation model of intergroup conflict.Holmes Miller & Kurt J. Engemann - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):355-367.
Individual differences in subtle awareness and levels of awareness: Olfaction as a model system.Gary E. Schwartz - 2000 - In Robert G. Kunzendorf & B. Alan Wallace (eds.), Individual Differences in Conscious Experience. John Benjamins. pp. 209.
The Metaphysics of Gender.Charlotte Witt - 2011 - , US: Oup Usa.
Pornography as Simulation.Theodore Bach - 2010 - In Dave Monroe (ed.), Pornography: Philosophy for Everyone.
Gender-Technology Relations: Exploring Stability and Change.Hilde G. Corneliussen - 2011 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
No mirrors for the powerful: Why dominant smiles are not processed using embodied simulation.Li Huang & Adam D. Galinsky - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):448-448.
Cognitive social simulation incorporating cognitive architectures.Ron Sun - unknown
Fixed versus flexible strategists: Individual differences in facultative responsiveness?Jay Belsky - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):591-592.
Universal belief-desire psychology? A dilemma for theory theory and simulation theory.Derek W. Strijbos & Leon C. de Bruin - 2013 - Philosophical Psychology 26 (5):744-764.
Individual differences in patterns of hypnotic experience across low and high hypnotically susceptible individuals.Ronald J. Pekala & V. K. Kumar - 2000 - In Robert G. Kunzendorf & Benjamin Wallace (eds.), Individual Differences in Conscious Experience. John Benjamins. pp. 309-335.
Simulating organizational decision-making using a cognitively realistic agent model.Ron Sun - manuscript
Gender Differences in Ethics Research: The Importance of Controlling for the Social Desirability Response Bias. [REVIEW]Derek Dalton & Marc Ortegren - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (1):73-93.
Selected individual differences and collegians' ethical beliefs.Michael K. McCuddy & Barbara L. Peery - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (3):261 - 272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
26 (#615,896)

6 months
11 (#248,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elizabeth Simpson
Walden University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references