No mirrors for the powerful: Why dominant smiles are not processed using embodied simulation

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):448-448 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A complete model of smile interpretation needs to incorporate its social context. We argue that embodied simulation is an unlikely route for understanding dominance smiles, which typically occur in the context of power. We support this argument by discussing the lack of eye contact with dominant faces and the facial and postural complementarity, rather than mimicry, that pervades hierarchical relationships

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is so special about embodied simulation?Vittorio Gallese & Corrado Sinigaglia - 2011 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (11):512-519.
A Critique of Embodied Simulation.Shannon Spaulding - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (3):579-599.
Embodied cognition and theory of mind.Shannon Spaulding - 2014 - In Lawrence A. Shapiro (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition. New York: Routledge. pp. 197-206.
How Are Semantic Metarepresentations Built and Processed?Manuel Bremer - 2012 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 26 (1).
Mirror systems and simulation: a neo-empiricist interpretation. [REVIEW]John Michael - 2012 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (4):565-582.
Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation.Raymond W. Gibbs - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (3):434–458.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
32 (#504,058)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The measurement of meaning.Charles Egerton Osgood - 1957 - Urbana,: University of Illinois Press. Edited by Donald C. Hildum.

Add more references