Ein vier-Prinzipien-Ansatz für die Bioethik: Geschichte, Methode, Kritik und Übertragbarkeit auf andere Bereiche

Zeitschrift Für Evangelische Ethik 51 (3):182-198 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The four-principles-approach of Tom Beauchamp and Jim Childress has been very influential in bioethics in the last decades. It has proven well although mid-level principles in general and this approach in particular are highly contested by ethicists who would prefer approaches rather based on rules, virtues or personal relations. The author of this study systematically discusses the origin, method and criticism of the Beauchamp and Childress approach. Finally he argues that the applicability of this approach for ethical challenges in the biomedical setting should stimulate a principled approach for ethical challenges of public health as well. Such an approach can utilize the method from Beauchamp and Childress. Principles for public health ethics, as presented in a concise set by the author, however, must be different in scope and content to meet the ethical challenges of public health

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The method of 'principlism': A critique of the critique.B. Andrew Lustig - 1992 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (5):487-510.
Principles of biomedical ethics / Tom L. Beauchamp, James F. Childress.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1994 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
Single-principle versus multi-principles approaches in bioethics.Bert Heinrichs - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):72-83.
What is the Common Morality, Really?Benjamin Bautz - 2016 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26 (1):29-45.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
15 (#946,138)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Schröder
Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references