Merge: Contorted architecture, distorted facts, and purported autonomy

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):345-346 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Norris, McQueen & Cutler claim that Merge is an autonomous model, superior to the interactive TRACE model and the autonomous Race model. Merge is actually an interactive model, despite claims to the contrary. The presentation of the literature seriously distorts many findings, in order to advocate autonomy. It is Merge's interactivity that allows it to simulate findings in the literature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Merging speech perception and production.Antje S. Meyer & Willem J. M. Levelt - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):339-340.
Merging information versus speech recognition.Irene Appelbaum - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):325-326.
Hesitations and clarifications on a model to abandon feedback.Louisa M. Slowiaczek - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):347-347.
Lexical biases are useful.José R. Benkí - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):326-327.
Some concerns about the phoneme-like inputs to merge.Terrance M. Nearey - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):342-343.
Model evaluation and data interpretation.Mark Pitt - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):344-345.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
33 (#483,942)

6 months
9 (#307,343)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references