Some concerns about the phoneme-like inputs to merge

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):342-343 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As a proponent of phoneme-like units in speech perception, I am very sympathetic to Merge's use of phoneme-oriented input. However, in the absence of any known way to provide input in exactly the form assumed, further consideration needs to be given to how the variation in the details of the specification of this input might affect Merge's (and Shortlist's) overall behavior.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Model evaluation and data interpretation.Mark Pitt - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):344-345.
One phonemic representation should suffice.David W. Gow - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):331-331.
Inhibition.Cynthia M. Connine & Paul C. LoCasto - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):328-328.
Lexical biases are useful.José R. Benkí - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):326-327.
Syntax and semantics: an overview.Arnim von Stechow - 2012 - In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. De Gruyter Mouton.
Merging information versus speech recognition.Irene Appelbaum - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):325-326.
The trouble with merge: Modeling speeded target detection.Jonathan Grainger - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):331-332.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#588,912)

6 months
7 (#428,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references