Digital disability divide in information society

Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13 (3/4):283-298 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to create a conceptual framework, based on a structured literature review, to analyze the digital disability divide and help find solutions for it. A digital disability divide exists between people with impairments and those without impairments. Multiple studies have shown that people without impairments are less likely to own a computer or have an Internet connection than are people with impairments. However, the digital disability divide is seen in relation not only to access but also to accessibility and use. For people with impairments, new technological innovations offer solutions for everyday challenges, such as finding information, communicating with others and using electronic services.Design/methodology/approach– For this study, 4,778 conference and journal publications were systematically analyzed.Findings– A number of key findings emerged. This field is relatively new, and the literature is highly focused on the technological and social aspects of the digital disability divide, with technology and societal attributes being the core sub-attributes for a comprehensive model. The previous literature did not significantly study the consequences of the financial situation of individuals; rather, the predominant focus was on the have-nots and countries with low income potentials. Furthermore, motivation reveals a compelling case within the digital disability divide subset.Originality/value– The review provides a consolidated view of past research on the general topic of the digital disability divide and the attributes that affect it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical gaps in studies of the digital divide.Kenneth L. Hacker & Shana M. Mason - 2003 - Ethics and Information Technology 5 (2):99-115.
E-exclusion and the Gender Digital Divide.Georgia Foteinou - 2010 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 40 (3):50-61.
The tragedy of the digital commons.Gian Maria Greco & Luciano Floridi - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (2):73-81.
Ethical reflections on the digital divide.Herman T. Tavani - 2003 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 1 (2):99-108.
No country for older people? Age and the digital divide.Ruth Abbey & Sarah Hyde - 2009 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 7 (4):225-242.
The "Digital Divide" Is Not a Problem in Need of Rectifying.Walter Block - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):393 - 406.
The Third World and the paradox of the digital revolution.Mohamed Mesbahi - 2007 - International Review of Information Ethics 7:47-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-02

Downloads
50 (#326,535)

6 months
15 (#185,490)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

A theory of human motivation.A. H. Maslow - 1943 - Psychological Review 50 (4):370-396.

Add more references