The theory of punctuated equilibria

In Peter K. Machamer, Marcello Pera & Aristeidēs Baltas (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Oxford University Press. pp. 230 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are punctuationists wrong about the modern synthesis?Benton M. Stidd - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):98-109.
Popper, falsifiability, and evolutionary biology.David N. Stamos - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):161-191.
Does meaning evolove?Mark D. Roberts - forthcoming - Philosophical Explorations.
Changing conceptions of species.Bradley E. Wilson - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (3):405-420.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
16 (#913,262)

6 months
2 (#1,206,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Ruse
Florida State University

Citations of this work

Fighting about frequency.Karen Kovaka - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):7777-7797.
Epistemic values in the Burgess Shale debate.Christian Baron - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (4):286-295.
Epistemic values in the Burgess Shale debate.Christian Baron - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (4):286-295.
A Web of Controversies: Complexity in the Burgess Shale Debate. [REVIEW]Christian Baron - 2011 - Journal of the History of Biology 44 (4):745 - 780.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references