Sobre a recepção do conceito de Verantwortlichkeit de Wilhelm Windelband na antinomia das éticas da convicção e da responsabilidade de Max Weber/The reception of Wilhelm Windelband’s concept of Verantwortlichkeit in Max Weber’s antinomy between the ethic of conviction and the ethic of responsibility

Seara Filosófica 7:1-12 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the following pages, the main proposal is to indicate how Max Weber has dialogued directly with some prerogatives from Kant’s Critic of practical Reason, following the reception of Wilhelm Windelband’s concept of “responsibility” (Verantwortlichkeit) and his theory of values. In sight of these influences, in this paper will be argued how Weber adherence to the neo-Kantian value concept has made possible a review on the categorical imperatives, which has turned his reading from Kantian philosophy to the proposal of an antinomy between the ethic of conviction and the ethic of responsibility inside the Kantian moral maxims. Nessa abordagem será proposto que a recepção de Max Weber do conceito de “responsabilidade” (Verantwortlichkeit) de Wilhelm Windelband, bem como sua revisão de certos elementos da filosofia dos valores neokantiana do sudoeste da Alemanha, permitiram que Weber estabelecesse um diálogo mais direto com os pressupostos de Kant em sua Crítica da razão prática. Em vista dessas influências, o presente artigo argumentará que a maneira como Weber revisa os imperativos categóricos direcionou sua compreensão da filosofia kantiana pelo conceito de “valores”, o permitindo ainda, propor a existência de uma antinomia entre a ética da convicção e da responsabilidade no interior das máximas morais kantianas.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Structure of Max Weber's Ethic of Responsibility.Bradley E. Starr - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (3):407 - 434.
Weber's Protestant ethic: origins, evidence, contexts.Hartmut Lehmann & Guenther Roth (eds.) - 1993 - New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
Wilhelm Windelband and the problem of relativism.Katherina Kinzel - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (1):84-107.
Weber's Historical Concept of National Identity'.Harry Liebersohn - 1993 - In Hartmut Lehmann & Guenther Roth (eds.), Weber's Protestant ethic: origins, evidence, contexts. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. pp. 125.
Livre-arbítrio e responsabilidade a naturalização da responsabilidade de P. F. Strawson.Ricardo Bins di Napoli - 2009 - Ethic@ - An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 8 (3):73-88.
Historicism and neo-Kantianism.Fred Beiser - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (4):554-564.
The Protestant Ethic thesis: Weber’s missing psychology.Ronald Mather - 2005 - History of the Human Sciences 18 (3):1-16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-27

Downloads
416 (#47,724)

6 months
54 (#83,742)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations